<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Leading Spirit &#187; common purpose</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leadingspirit.com/blog/tag/common-purpose/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leadingspirit.com/blog</link>
	<description>Strategic Services for Leaders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:09:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Alignment vs. Agreement – Which is the Way Forward?</title>
		<link>http://leadingspirit.com/blog/coaching/alignment-vs-agreement-%e2%80%93-which-is-the-way-forward/</link>
		<comments>http://leadingspirit.com/blog/coaching/alignment-vs-agreement-%e2%80%93-which-is-the-way-forward/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leigh Marz &#38; Grace Flannery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Assessments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Team Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alignment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[common purpose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resolving conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shared values]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leadingspirit.com/blog/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In alignment-based organizations, diverse voices are valued. There's creativity, innovation and trust because people can comfortably speak their mind. They can have disagreements about how to do something or what to do next because they're all aligned around a common purpose and clear understanding.

In agreement-based organizations, creativity is stifled and fear of "breaking the rules" or "rocking the boat" runs rampant. Staffers play it safe around conflict, which can be just as damaging as tearing each other's eyes out. Teams, departments and staffers don't work together well, and the organization as a whole suffers greatly.

The choice seems pretty obvious, so how do you create and sustain an alignment-based organization?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In alignment-based organizations, diverse voices are valued. There&#8217;s creativity, innovation and trust because people can comfortably speak their mind. They can have disagreements about <em>how</em> to do something or <em>what</em> to do next because they&#8217;re all aligned around a common purpose and clear understanding.</p>
<p>In agreement-based organizations, creativity is stifled and fear of &#8220;breaking the rules&#8221; or &#8220;rocking the boat&#8221; runs rampant. Staffers play it safe around conflict, which can be just as damaging as tearing each other&#8217;s eyes out. Teams, departments and staffers don&#8217;t work together well, and the organization as a whole suffers greatly.</p>
<p>The choice seems pretty obvious, so how do you create and sustain an alignment-based organization?</p>
<p>Often when there&#8217;s conflict within teams (or whole organizations), it&#8217;s because people with strongly held positions are trying to force one another to agree with them—to get the opposition to drop that position, &#8220;see the light&#8221; and adopt a new opinion. That&#8217;s a difficult feat to pull off, and it usually results in resentment among both parties and the losing party &#8220;shutting down.&#8221;</p>
<p>So the key in team coaching is to move away from the opinions and positions of &#8220;agreement&#8221; into the shared interests and shared intentions of &#8220;alignment.&#8221; That&#8217;s how teams get unstuck and on the same page.</p>
<p><strong>People will tend to agree with each other about what&#8217;s important while disagreeing with each other about what to do about it. </strong>So, what alignment is all about is focusing on the underlying values, purpose and mission that team members have in common.</p>
<p>Say, for example, I think we should put out a monthly newsletter, while my colleague feels strongly it should be a quarterly offering. We simply don&#8217;t agree, and we&#8217;re not even very close to consensus. But if you look underneath the surface to <em>why</em> we hold our positions, my colleague feels it&#8217;s important, in this economy, to control overhead costs and send out marketing materials of the highest quality. Meanwhile, I think it&#8217;s important we stay in touch with our members frequently and sustain and regularly reinforce that message.</p>
<p>So if you work at that level underneath the positions, you start to see that it&#8217;s ALL important. We can both get on the same page that it&#8217;s important to honor our budget and have well-written materials, while it&#8217;s also important to be in frequent enough contact with our members that they remember who we are and what we stand for.</p>
<p>At its essence, we both just want what&#8217;s best for the organization and can work on a solution that honors all those key points at once. It doesn&#8217;t have to be one way or the other; we can try to plan our newsletter in a way that will be timely, high quality and within budget restrictions.</p>
<p>When people are at loggerheads, if you go beneath the surface to the intention behind the desired course of action, there tends to be a lot more in <em>alignment</em> than they think. When that&#8217;s uncovered, it&#8217;s possible to construct avenues from which to proceed where both parties are satisfied and the organization is best served. It aligns both behind a common purpose, where rather than a problem <em>in between</em> them, they can stand shoulder-to-shoulder looking at the problem and explore options and answers.</p>
<h3>Utilizing Coaching to Achieve Alignment</h3>
<p>One of the most powerful times to use team training, coaching and facilitation is at the start of a new project or program. That way, you have help to ensure all the planning begins from a place of alignment. What happens more frequently, though, is we get called in when a team is in conflict or has &#8220;gone flat&#8221; and is lacking in productivity. In these cases, it&#8217;s more like an intervention. You might also consider using a team-building retreat or workshop as an opportunity to shift your organization&#8217;s culture.</p>
<p>And once people become familiar and comfortable with the alignment-based concept, they start to ask very different questions of one another. They start to naturally look beneath the surface for that common purpose or common values so they can join forces. They literally hear one another differently in the search for shared intentions.</p>
<p>So, the next time you hear someone within your organization say, &#8220;No, <em>I&#8217;m right</em> &#8230;&#8221;, you know there&#8217;s room for an alignment-based shift. If you&#8217;re not clear where your organization lies on the scale, we have diagnostic tools that measure alignment (among many other things), within your system. Just know if you need support or guidance, we&#8217;re here to help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://leadingspirit.com/blog/coaching/alignment-vs-agreement-%e2%80%93-which-is-the-way-forward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

