<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Leading Spirit &#187; sustainability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leadingspirit.com/blog/tag/sustainability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leadingspirit.com/blog</link>
	<description>Strategic Services for Leaders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:09:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>As a Leader, Do You Value Dissent? – Pt. 1</title>
		<link>http://leadingspirit.com/blog/coaching/as-a-leader-do-you-value-dissent-%e2%80%93-pt-1/</link>
		<comments>http://leadingspirit.com/blog/coaching/as-a-leader-do-you-value-dissent-%e2%80%93-pt-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julie Davidson-Gómez, Leigh Marz &#38; Grace Flannery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategic Consultation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Team Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dissenting voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resolving conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rocking the boat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leadingspirit.com/blog/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When there's differences of opinion within an organization, often that's pictured as knockdown, blowout arguments between strong-willed individuals. That happens. But as we noted in our last post, agreement-based organizations suffer from "safeness" and "niceness" every bit as much as angry conflict. Yet for some reason, this softer side of the problem is rarely discussed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When there&#8217;s differences of opinion within an organization, often that&#8217;s pictured as knockdown, blowout arguments between strong-willed individuals. That happens. But as we noted in our <a href="http://leadingspirit.com/blog/coaching/alignment-vs-agreement-%E2%80%93-which-is-the-way-forward/" target="_blank">last post</a>, agreement-based organizations suffer from &#8220;safeness&#8221; and &#8220;niceness&#8221; every bit as much as angry conflict. Yet for some reason, this softer side of the problem is rarely discussed.</p>
<p>When an organizational culture puts agreement and <em>harmony</em> above all else, there is a clear dampening effect on minority voices and divergent viewpoints. People want to be positive and productive so much that they keep their mouth shut to ensure they&#8217;re not a &#8220;downer&#8221; or &#8220;causing too much trouble.&#8221; That seems thoughtful, but it actually does the organization a serious disservice; the first idea isn&#8217;t always the best one. The practices in place are often outdated and in need of fresh interpretation. Team cohesiveness isn&#8217;t always as important as individual ingenuity (gasp!).</p>
<p>This is the shadow side of agreement. Respectful-yet-dissenting voices are essential to the healthy evolution of an organization. So, the people within that organization must feel comfortable speaking up, even if it does rock the boat. It&#8217;s up to those in leadership roles to create a system of permission that will best serve the organization.</p>
<p>In Summer 2007, <em>Leading Spirit</em> began to help a board of directors with team coaching and training. In addition, we also provided organizational development consulting in support of their transition from a fiscally sponsored entity to a 501(c)(3) nonprofit.</p>
<p>They looked to us to help formulate the organization&#8217;s trajectory and help them become more conscious of, and more aligned around, what the organization needed from them as leaders. They needed to clearly know what roles and responsibilities each of them would have moving forward, what kinds of conversations were necessary and worthwhile and how to deal with conflicts or differences of opinion.</p>
<p>We recognized their high positivity, productivity and hard work but showed them how their lack of conflict (and lack of skills around conflict) hurt them in the long run. This hadn&#8217;t been done in a conscious way before. No one really had clear permission to &#8220;step out of line&#8221; and express an individual viewpoint.</p>
<p>So, together we designed the organizational culture in an intentional way that would leave room for free expression and allow everyone to really know what&#8217;s going on when making decisions. They learned that <strong><em>what creates sustainability is the ability to speak the truth</em></strong>—that careful behavior actually erodes sustainability because you&#8217;re not having the conversations you need to have.</p>
<p>And through the course of our coaching together, they realized the importance of all their voices to informing the larger system. That now extends to the staff as well, as we&#8217;ve been able to facilitate retreats with the board and the staff all together. They&#8217;ve recognized the importance of those diverse opinions and voices in shaping and strengthening the organization as a whole. There was a level of carefulness that&#8217;s now been replaced by full trust and full permission to speak your mind, and they&#8217;re a much better organization for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://leadingspirit.com/blog/coaching/as-a-leader-do-you-value-dissent-%e2%80%93-pt-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
